2012 AMCHP Annual Conference

1. The overall quality of the conference archive web site was high.

5 = Strongly Agree
4 = Agree
3 = Neutral
2 = Disagree
1 = Strongly Disagree

2. Speakers were knowledgeable about the subject matter.

5 = Strongly Agree
4 = Agree
3 = Neutral
2 = Disagree
1 = Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable

3. The overall quality of the presentations was high.

5 = Strongly Agree
4 = Agree
3 = Neutral
2 = Disagree
1 = Strongly Disagree

4. Access to the presentations was achieved without technical difficulty.

5 = Strongly Agree
4 = Agree
3 = Neutral
2 = Disagree
1 = Strongly Disagree

5. The quality of the video and/or audio was good.

5 = Strongly Agree
4 = Agree
3 = Neutral
2 = Disagree
1 = Strongly Disagree

6. I would access other online conference archives in the future.

5 = Strongly Agree
4 = Agree
3 = Neutral
2 = Disagree
1 = Strongly Disagree

7. Please comment on specific characteristics of the conference archive that were most beneficial to you:


8. Please comment on specific aspects of the conference archive that need improvement: